By Pete Lucas, a contributing author:
Libertarian ideals often intersect with conservative beliefs. As someone who considers himself a Reagan conservative, I actually find myself aligned with the Libertarian philosophy more often than not.
Here in Kansas just a few months ago, we faced a budget crisis that nearly shut down our state. We ended up averting the crisis by borrowing money from ourselves… a temporary fix at best. The problem during this recession is a shrinking tax base due to property value depreciation, unemployed Kansans, and uncertainty about how much the federal government intends to help.
I believe that a true conservative - one dedicated to limited government - has to be wary of the federal intervention at every level. Take for example a long-standing intervention in the public school system. The federal government has no mandate to provide public education. This is a state and local issue. However, through incentives (blackmail), the feds have managed to take a huge role in education.
Thus, we Kansans should be skeptical of any federal bailout money. There’s no such thing as a free lunch, and the price we’ll end up paying is huge, and could be catastrophic.
However, the states that have threatened to refuse bailout money have come under fire for being short-sighted and silly. They don’t have a means to make up the funds without the bailout money because unlike the federal government, states can’t just fire up the presses and print more cash.
This is precisely why we as conservatives need to embrace wide scale legalization of “vices” that are currently illegal. Marijuana is only the start. All illegal narcotics should be legalized, regulated and taxed. Prostitution should be legalized, regulated and taxed. The government does not have a mandate nor does it have the right to interfere with what people do in their personal lives.
We learned nearly a century ago that prohibition only creates a violent black market. It doesn’t stop people from engaging in whatever their vice happens to be. Criminals facilitate the market of drugs and prostitution because they have an opportunity to get rich quick. Most of the crime in America is related to drugs and prostitution. Our prisons are full of pot smokers. We parole violent criminals to make room in prison for new pot smokers.
Certainly, using addictive, dangerous narcotics is foolhardy, but so is drinking to excess. At least in a legal environment, we can regulate the quality of drugs, introduce corporate competition, and tax the daylights out of it. The same is true of prostitution. A regulated, legal brothel is far less dangerous than women who meet Johns through a pimp or through an online site.
Since I also believe in personal responsibility, I believe that people who use dangerous substances (including alcohol, drugs, cigarettes, etc.) should have any related illnesses excluded from insurance coverage. If you smoke 4 packs a day and get lung cancer, that’s a shame, but it should not qualify for coverage because then everyone has to pay for that bad decision.
Obviously, there have to be consequences for people who use drugs and harm another person (for example DUI). Our drunk driving laws are completely inadequate. We need to shore up these laws and enforce them strictly. No one would drive drunk if we had and automatic 25 year sentence (life if you hurt or killed someone). The same would be true with drugs. You can’t play games with it. I’ve lost loved ones to drunk drivers, and as such I’m in favor of any punishment that acts as a true deterrent.
People say that if drugs and prostitution were legal, society would come undone. I disagree strongly. Most of us would not engage in either behavior. I have no interest in narcotics or prostitutes whether they are legal or not. Cigarettes and alcohol are legal and I don’t use either. I’m sure most of you feel the same way. Illegality is not a deterrent for the people who really want to engage in a behavior.
We can create a safer society with less people in prison, generate more tax revenue, and enjoy freedom like our founding fathers intended.